Danielle DeCosta is a Senior Manager at AcademyHealth where she is responsible for managing projects to enhance the impact and relevance of health services research, applying the tools of human-centered design to drive innovation in the research enterprise and supporting a number of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grantmaking initiatives. In this role, her responsibilities include project management and strategy, qualitative research and analysis, proposal review, and impact evaluation. Her past projects have also included a workshop to explore states’ usage of disadvantage indices to advance health equity in their COVID-19 vaccination efforts, the development of rapid-cycle research priorities to inform health systems in their pandemic response, and qualitative analysis of state-based maternal health data infrastructure needs.

Prior to joining AcademyHealth, Danielle worked for the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, providing communications, policy advocacy, and other technical assistance to the foundation's grantmaking program to improve the system of care for children with special health care needs. Danielle also previously supported a program that aims to expand contraceptive access in metropolitan hubs in Asia and Africa through the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, consulted on a USAID community-building initiative in Jamaica, and interned with the Alameda County Public Health Department. Danielle holds an M.P.H. from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health with a concentration in health systems and policy and a B.S. in biology from Stanford University.

Authored by Danielle DeCosta, M.P.H.

Publication

Documenting the Ripple Effects of Dobbs on Health, Equity, and Health Services Research

The aftershocks of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision overturning the constitutional right to abortion continue to reverberate through the U.S. health care system. This brief and accompanying research agenda highlight priority research topics, methods, and recommendations for health services research to examine these wide-ranging implications on reproductive health care, health equity, and beyond.
Posted
Publication

Documenting the Ripple Effects of Dobbs on Health, Equity, and Health Services Research: Executive Summary

The aftershocks of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision overturning the constitutional right to abortion continue to reverberate through the U.S. health care system. This brief and accompanying research agenda highlight priority research topics, methods, and recommendations for health services research to examine these wide-ranging implications on reproductive health care, health equity, and beyond.
Posted
Blog Post

Reproductive Health and Health Services Research Partnerships Are Critical to Understand the Full Impact of the Dobbs Decision

HSR can play an important role in uncovering the impacts of the Dobbs decision on the health care system and health equity, and will be most effective in partnership with community voices and reproductive health researchers. A new brief shares an initial research agenda and an upcoming webinar provides an opportunity for further reflection and discussion.
Posted By Danielle DeCosta, M.P.H.
Blog Post

Study Tour Reflections from Dave Chokshi and Aaron Carroll in JAMA Health Forum and The New York Times: Moving Beyond the Health Insurance Debates

In a two-part essay for JAMA Health Forum and a NY Times column, Dave Chokshi and Aaron Carroll respectively share insights from the 2023 AcademyHealth/Commonwealth Fund study tour to New Zealand, Australia, and Singapore that should be instructive for the U.S. health care and policy community.
Posted By Danielle DeCosta, M.P.H.